Comments on: Novel LMR-busting tactic … lol :-)

By: SMoKeLioN

SMoKeLioN — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:56:21 +0000

"SmokeLion, your comment is good and bad. It is good because I like that you have the experience to deal with LMR in cases that lead to mutually satisfying casual sex. Your 'tactic' is sound in this case. But the comment is bad because you spectacularly missed the point. I am not talking about 'baiting' anyone. It is not a 'tactic' at all. A long-lasting mutually

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:14:44 +0000

GS....aren't you delightful!! I bet I would have your panties off in 39 min ;)

Re: PUA terminology. No need to apologize, OK to be triggered some times, otherwise we might be mistaken for dead...

However!
I do believe strongly that words are power, and therefore, glad you agree with me with the choice of jargon as "unfortunate". :)

it may

By: GoneSavage

GoneSavage — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:56:03 +0000

>>>"what if SHE sucks in bed after I commit to her?"

I used to think this way. After you get a couple hundred notches on your belt, you'll know if woman is expressive/enthusuastic/good before you've penetrated. It's just not at issue -- you know.

Similarly, commitment is not an issue. A guy is more than happy to commit when he finds a worthy

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:43:59 +0000

i have to say i agree with the LTR baiting "bleh" comment.

if a guy with a bunch of cheesy lines & absolutely no history of of long-term relationships starts "baiting" me with LTR garble, i will probably see it for the bullshit it is or think he is delusional. i may sleep with him, but its up to him to deal with his own distorted reality without making it my

By: SMoKeLioN

SMoKeLioN — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:22:41 +0000

I have to totally disagree with this.

The more LTR'ish my interactions are and frames/stories/whatevers are, the more LMR I get if I try to get them in bed faster. Why? Because a lot of girls falsely believe that if a guy sleeps with a girl right away, he never calls them again.

Sometimes it IS the guy. But other times, Id have to say the girl is. For example, she

By: GoneSavage

GoneSavage — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:08:02 +0000

When I say, "I am going to try a novel LMR-busting tactic called becoming LTR material," this is what I mean: I'm going to deal with my own shit and become a better person — my higher self. Independent of you and your reaction. This is not a tactic at all, guys — how much 'game' would you really need if you knew yourself to the core and actually became not just '

By: Erika

Erika — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:04:10 +0000

Thank you, lilredgirlie, for a refreshing breath of fresh air. It's hard to believe that many men do not realize how sacred sex is for many women.

Anonymous 4:22 pm, please give the guy a little credit. My LMR has become virtually impenetrable, and he got about as close as any man is going to get until I am married.

Anonymous 10:53 am, there is a method to my madness.

By: lilreddgirlie

lilreddgirlie — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:48:23 +0000

Lol... I feel amused that that guy thinks Erika has intimacy "issues" for not having sex and for thinking sex is sacred.

Hello... that's how a lot of women frame things buddy...

Good luck on your quest... please look into that... haha

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:22:22 +0000

"Sex is not happening unless and until we are married."

Sounds like his creepy LMR busting texts failed miserably.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:43:56 +0000

Do you honestly think your intimacy issues are going to disappear the moment a man places a ring on your finger? You didn't have sex for nearly 5 years. Assuming you were physically healthy, that means something is wrong with your psychology. Whatever that is isn't going to go away because you've been flirting with the top PUA's, doing EFT and posting on seduction forums.